Corruption Of The Law Enforcement - 2120 Words

Corruption in Law Enforcement Nicholas Colbert University of Texas at El Paso Corruption in Law Enforcement Corruption has always been a problem. From the beginning it was embedded into law enforcement. Corruption is not just a problem that affects a few people. In the long run many lives are affected and often ruined. There are many people in law enforcement that abuse their powers, but thanks to a few good people, everyone can enjoy having law enforcement agencies that really look after the people, execute their job functions, and try to better themselves as well as the agency they work for. Unfortunately, as technology changes, so will people. Corruption will never go away and when people in law enforcement are being corrupt,†¦show more content†¦Wardens served warrants and acted as detectives. They also recovered stolen property and did street patrol. Wardens typically were not liked by the people. It was quoted â€Å"Colonial law enforcement was inefficient, corrupt, and subject to political indifference.† (Walker, 1999) The cities quickly grew by the 1800s and had to find a better form of law enforcement. Sir Robert Peele then introduced municipal policing. He believed that the police should be organized and should be familiar with the neighborhoods they were to police. He felt that the officers should be humble and look presentable. Sir Robert Peele supported the territorial approach. By 1870, Peele’s strategy had spread to every major city in America. In the 1800s day watch systems were also established in some of these major cities. By the mid 1800’s both day and night systems were combined to provide protection all day. In the early 1900s there were many advancements to policing making it more professional. On July 26, 1908, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was formed and on March 16, 1909 they became official. During this time technology also had an impact on policing. Phone use, radios, and car patrol became common. The cities grew, policing have improved, but there was no centralized form of government. Small departments acted independently and the larger departments had smaller precincts that sometimes acted as small departments. The colonists did not want a centralized government because