“Necessity Is Something in the Mind, Not in Objects”

Hume believed that the common nonion of cause and effect is wrong. This faith on his part stemmed directly from the assumptions he made preliminary on when creating his philosophical system. He divided human perception into twain impressions were supposed to be instant, strong feelings or perceptions, whereas estimations argon those that have already faded a elan, leaving us with only a partial knowledge of what we felt.Ideas have their source in impressions therefore if there exists a sensible idea of necessity, it has to come from an earlier impression. Yet no impression feeler from our external environment can give us any idea about necessity. Nor can we find it in ourselves, because even if we see our torso move a hand, how can we be sure it is us who moves it? As it inevitably turns out, according to Hume, because we have no experience of necessity, it is our mind that creates these connections we are so sure about.It is our habit to look for cause and effect, because t hats the way to easily explain how world functions to ourselves. We are assuming that certain causes lead create equal effects as in the past not because we can prove it, but because it has been this way before. A good typesetters case of this is how we expect the lie to rise every morning using the numeric method of induction we assume that what has been true in the past, will be true in the future as well.Of course, something might stop the Sun from rising in the morning, so the right thing would be to regularize that it is highly probable that it will rise, but there is no certainty. We abbreviate all of this, because its more convenient, and it lies in human nature to resign advantage of it. Of course, Hume does not say, that causality/necessity doesnt in point exist, he only points to the fact that we are unable to derive its origination from hard facts and are instead using a very high-risk method of reasoning.