How does Fitzgerald’s variety of language techniques illustrate his views on the lifestyle of the era, here and in the novel as a whole

With savoir-faire to at least 2 passages, limn how Fitzgeralds variety of language techniques elaborate his views on the life style of the era, here and in the novel as a whole.Fitzgerald manipulations many different literary techniques to acquaint his opinion of the lifestyle during the 1920s. The use of Nick Carraway as narrator continually exposes the readers to both the positives, and opposes of this era. Throughout The long Gatsby Fitzgerald explores key appends of The jazz age. The role of women and the hierarchy of society atomic number 18 two of the main consequences which Fitzgerald explores.Throughout passage wholeness there is a big divide of social status and it is clear that the differences within the differentiate hierarchy are profoundHes so dumb he doesnt complete hes alive.Fitzgerald uses the brutal extension of gobbler Buchanan to personate the divide and disapproval of working phase citizens wish Wilson. The use of strong adjectives portrays th e mal intervention of the working class. In passage two Fitzgerald presents the opposite end of the hierarchy to the readers. The readers are so exposed to a world of wealthsuperior couples h octogenarianing from each one other tortuously, fashionably, and keeping to the cornersThe continued use of adjectives by Fitzgerald this magazine creates a different image. He creates a disjointed atmosphere which is contrasted by wealth. The negative imagery that is created challenges the idea of The American daydream and the fallible belief of characters like Wilson that success and therefore wealth is essential. This contrasts the first passage where Fitzgerald portrays the negatives of p all overty. Fitzgerald suggests that there was no equilibrium of success and wealth in that society. However, Fitzgerald was in fact trip of the higher social class who contributed to these parties.Infidelity is a key issue that Fitzgerald exposes in this novel and this is especially true for passage o neShe smiled tardily and, walking through her husband as if he were a ghost, shake hands with gobbler, looking him flush in the eye.Fitzgerald uses his narrator Nick to acknowledge the desperate actions of a typical working class woman of the 1920s. Fitzgeralds rabble-ro apply language, looking him flush in the eye, portrays Myrtles obsessive pursuit of wealth and hypothetic happiness. The idea of The American Dream is once again divulged, as Myrtles call for for wealth sacrifices her marriage. The comparison of Wilson to a ghost is important because it shows that Fitzgerald dis respects of Myrtles actions and is trying to portray her callous demeanor. The technique of formal, introductory action, shook hands with Tom is apply by Fitzgerald in contrast to the deeper more intimate birth below the superficial appearance. This represents Fitzgerald and his sympathy in this instance for the scant(p), hardworking citizens even though he was himself part of this wealthy lifestyl e. In passage two no direct infidelity is explored by Fitzgerald however the idea of frivolity amongst couples isthither was dancing now on the canvas in the garden old men pushing young girls backward in eternal graceless circlesFitzgeralds use of pushing and graceless suggests that there is no friendship or intensity in relationships. too to the worthless marriage of Wilson and Myrtle, these couples are mortifying and without attachment.The role of women is a major flaw of society within this time period. Fitzgerald suggests mistreatment in his description of, old men pushing young girls He emphasises the lack of connection amongst couples and presence of govern over women. He disapproves of the treatment of women however he does non defend the women or even approve of their actions, single girls dancing individualistically His language is sarcastic and mocking towards the bibulous women at Gatsbys society. Both sides of Fitzgeralds arguments are made more significant by th e location, representing the treatment in humans situations. Fitzgerald is portraying the lack of reaction amongst citizens of the 1920s. Similarly to when Tom broke Daisys nose. Although the action was recognised by Nick it was not dwelled upon. This domination is re-emphasised later in the novel at another public party locationWhenever he sees Im having a good time he wants to go home.Fitzgerald repeatedly features dominating, bullying husbands who control their wives and restrict their lives. However, some would bespeak that the control is to stop inappropriate behaviour of the typically drunk women of the era. This control over women is paralleled in passage one by the dominating male person character of TomI want to see youGet on the next train.Fitzgerald uses Toms brutal nature and blunt direct speech to portray the worthlessness of women. Fitzgeralds language is domineering and controlling, which suggests that he has unfaithful motives for his arrangements with his girl. F itzgerald portrays an solo different character to the readers after Myrtles deathTom drove softIn a little while I heard a low husky sob, and saw that the tears were overflowing down his face.Fitzgerald shows the readers that this lifestyle can be fragile and vulnerable at times. The readers see a new side of Tom and it proves that although he was a domineering character he did have true feelings for Myrtle. Fitzgerald still represents the era by apply bold and masculine adjectives, low husky sob This description of Tom portrays the idea that people could not show fragility without trying to be superficially strong.The male domination of characters like Tom is similar to the behaviour of Mink in Postcards by Annie Proulx. Mink is a very possessive and restricting character, he controls his wife JewellMink wouldnt hear of it. Had a go every time I wanted to go somewhereThis ownership is very similar to Tom and his control that he needs over Daisy. However there is a difference, Mink and Jewell are very poor farmers which are directly contrasted by the wealth of Tom and Daisy. The American Dream that so many people went in search of, hoping that money meant happiness, is proved false. Two completely different male characters from different wealth context are still dominating and controlling. Therefore, American Dream seekers like Wilson, Myrtle, The Joad family from The Grapes of resentment, Lenny and George from Of mice and Men are blinded by a dream.Excess is an issue of the 1920s among successful wealthy people similar to those of Gatsby, Daisy and Tom. Fitzgerald displays initial disapproval of this gulaChampagne was served in glasses bigger than finger-bowls.The use of an upper class comparison makes this sentence more powerful. Fitzgerald compares excess with more flamboyant objects. This is rough-and-ready in the portrayal of the lavishness of parties. However, his possible disapproval is soon alter by the effects of alcohol and the narrator is soon engulfed in a wealthy societyI had taken two finger-bowls of champagne, and the scene has changed in the first place my eyes into something significant, elemental, and profound.Fitzgerald condemns the consumption of alcohol and displays its dangers perfectly through the transformation of his narrator and his remarks. He suggests that societys vision is clouded by alcohol and excessiveness displacement it impossible to possess educated and sensible opinions of the extravagant lifestyle. The excess of a public environment is directly contrasted with the poverty of a undercover location in passage onea grey, scrawny Italian churl was setting torpedoes in a row along the railroad track.This observation made by Tom is purposefully displaying Fitzgeralds disapproval of the excess of the Buchanons lifestyle. He shows readers that poverty was ignored by the upper class. Instead of helping the surface area characters similar to Tom want to ignore them and return to their luxuriou s lifestyles. The closed-door location is essential in the portrayal of the ignorance to poverty and the lack of connection with menial workers like Wilson.The entire novel displays one of the biggest flaws of 1920s society, superficiality. Passage two contains the superficiality of parties and public eventsVacuous bursts of laughter rose toward the summer sky.Fitzgerald uses a powerful adjective to describe the laughter as being fake. imagery is created of clouds floating into the sky this is created by Fitzgerald to display the superficial atmosphere. Everyone at the party is contributing to the hollow laughter and taking advantage of Gatsby and his hospitality. Fitzgerald is showing the readers a lack of genuine care or enjoyment, it is a superficial persona. Fitzgerald continues to show the readers that superficiality is present in private scenes like passage oneGet some chairshis wife moved close to Tom.Fitzgerald portrays how a relationship can be superficial. Myrtles order is brazen in order to perish time with Tom. He shows the readers that people of this era were superficial, for public show and private gain. This is similar behaviour to that of Daisy later on in the novel pull back us a cold drinkAs he left the room again she got up and went over to Gatsby and pulled his face down, kissing him in the mouth.This behaviour is paralleled to Myrtles they are both very cold and daring in these cases. Fitzgerald believes this is wrong and he displays this by the quick pace of the sentence, it shows a run to end the action. The behaviour is similar to that of Tom and his affair with Myrtle, which shows a authorization emerging for women. Daisy is now entering into an affair just as Tom is. Fitzgerald represents a clear disapproval of the unfaithful nature of society.I imagine Fitzgerald uses lots of literary techniques to cover all the key issues of the 1920s. He successfully describes situations vividly and encourages the reader using Nick as narrat or. The readers are promote to believe that the Jazz age was excessive, superficial, wealth obsessed and unfaithful. However, as Fitzgerald shows using Nick, it was a very attractive era which captured people and engulfed them in money.