USA Vs. Russia: Missile Defense :: essays research papers

National Missile Defense USA Vs. RussiaFor the past some(prenominal) old age, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and most congressional Republicans have wanted to set up a national missile defense dust, designed to defend the coupled States against a small number of long-range missiles. The Clinton authorities maintained that thither was no current or potential missile threat to the get together States that would justify the deployment of such a defense. At the same time the administration has pursued its "3+3" plan to spend three years developing a national missile defense -- by 2000 -- that could accordingly be deployed in an opposite three years -- by 2003, if a decision were made to deploy. George W. Bush, upon world elected, has given 6 months notice that the US is going to back out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty signed in 1972 (which clearly states that we cannot build a national missile defense), in frame to establish our national missile defense system. The reason simply being the fear of attacks from countries with long range missiles as well as new(prenominal) nuclear weapons. Countries such as China, North Korea, and Iraq. Russia, among other countries, were angered by the USs decision to back out of the treaty, therefore adding to the conflict.Most people atomic number 18 not clear on what exactly the missile defense system is, or what it does. Basically its, as Bush puts it, a system for intercepting other countries nuclear missiles aimed for us with a dummy non-explosive missile of our own. For example, if North Korea invaded southwest Korea and the US threatened to intervene, North Korea could threaten us back with a nuclear missile aimed for New York, Los Angeles, or any major city or landmark in our country. Bush would be willing to send the risk of the missile defense system intercepting the enemy missile, even though more than half the tests of the system have not worked correctly. Russias view on the United States con struction of a missile defense system is of course not a positive one. Peter Kilfoyle, a loudmouth novice of Russias defense policies has been a persistent thorn in the side of the government on defense issues. He criticised the "unilateralism" of the US administration in pressing ahead with the missile defence plan, warning that the Russians had been left feeling " soused and let down", while the Chinese were about to quadruple their take of intercontinental ballistic missiles.